Carter Center Logo Human Rights Defenders Initiative
Human Rights Defenders
Country Profile:  Malaysia

Background
The territory that is now Malaysia has endured intrusions since the beginning of the 16th century by several European colonial powers interested in its strategic location for commercial trade routes as well as the opportunity to convert inhabitants to Christianity. After Portuguese and Dutch control, the British consolidated their rule over the Malay states, creating various arrangements of governance through indirect rule.

Malaysia Islamic Party
Click Here for Larger Image >>

Female members from the Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party (PAS) pray during a women wing meeting in Kota Bahru, Malaysia, June 2, 2005. After a routing in last year's general election, the Islamic opposition party is preparing for a potential leadership shake-up at its annual congress this weekend, which it hopes will widen its appeal to moderate Muslims. (AP Photo/Vincent Thian)

In addition to threats from neighboring kingdoms, the federation the British created was by its nature fragile and characterized by internal instability and strife. To maintain control, the British implemented repressive legislation, which the current Malaysian government inherited and has yet to close this chapter in its colonial legacy. Following the British example, Malaysian prime ministers have used repressive legislation to maintain control. This legislation is also used to silence political opposition and criticism of the government's policies.

Malaysia has progressed dramatically since independence in ensuring the right to adequate health care, investing substantial financial resources in its public health system, and as a result the country has improved standards of health care for its citizens.  Human rights defenders in Malaysia, however, hold the government responsible for raising the level of respect for all human rights, including the rights of women; the rights of freedom of conscience, association, and expression; the rights of migrants; to due process of law; and other areas where human rights violations have been documented.

U.S. and International Policy

Cooperation on security matters between the United States and Great Britain has helped insulate Malaysia from international criticism on its human rights record. Before security ties between Malaysia and the United States increased following the "war on terror" policy, the United States found Malaysia's laws allowing for preventative and indefinite detention of suspects undemocratic. According to Nazri Abdul Aziz, a senior government minister, "[the United States is] less critical of us now because they probably have found it is necessary to fight terrorism and different countries have their own ways of doing it." (Malaysia Today, Sept. 10, 2006)

Malaysian defender Edmund Bon, who has served as counsel for those held under preventative detention laws has said: "The change in the U.S. stance was really important ... after 9/11, the United States took the foot off the pedal, a lot of momentum was lost. With international pressure reduced, we have to go back to the drawing board."

Other human rights lawyers in Malaysia have echoed this sentiment. There is a real sense that before the post-9/11 paradigm, the Malaysian government was prepared to give in to domestic and international pressure on some areas of due process guarantees for those detained under preventative detention laws.

Another argument that is used by the Malaysian government to justify policies inconsistent with international human rights obligations is the concept of "Asian values."  This perspective of cultural relativism proposes that what the international community understands as universal freedoms is, in reality, a set of norms rooted in a Western, individual rights-based tradition,, and therefore outside of the Asian values paradigm, which emphasizes a community-based approach . While there are merits to this argument in the eyes of some human rights activists working the Asian context, Salbiah Ahmad of Sisters in Islam disagrees. 

She says, "This [Asian values] argument has served to deflect international pressure.  The work has to be on the ground with civil society so that it cannot be seen as coming from the outside."

Thus, defenders on the ground who want to challenge government policies have discovered they must work on evolving an organic formulation of human rights, one that is rooted in their own tradition. In Malaysia, a predominantly Muslim country, defenders are working to define a human rights discourse in ways that are at once consistent with international norms and derived from Islamic teachings that articulate similar rights:

"There is a whole diversity of opinions, a diversity of interpretation, a diversity of laws – this rich diversity that is part of the Muslim heritage provides us with an incredibly rich source of information, scholarship, and opinion that we can work with to promote our belief in an Islam that upholds the principles of justice and equality, of freedom and dignity," says Zainah Anwar, member of Sisters in Islam.

Current Conditions for Human Rights Defenders
Defenders like Salbiah Ahmad and Zainah Anwar are successfully challenging government rhetoric and violations of rights; however, they take considerable risk because of the legislative tools the government has used to limit dissent. The 1960 Internal Security Act (ISA), known as the "White Terror," disregards basic democratic legal principles –  the right of the accused as innocent until proven guilty –  by circumventing the court trial system and indefinitely holding suspects behind bars. It provides for preventative detention for two months, which can be extended for up to two years, with an indefinite renewal provision. Passage of this act coincided with the end, in 1960, of the state of emergency declared by the British in June 1948.

Malaysia Demonstration
Click Here for Larger Image >>

Sarawak tribes women among 150 people show "Stop Bakun" placards during a protest rally against the $6 billion Bakun hydroelectric project in Sarawak, 870 kilometers (545 miles) southeast of Kuala Lumpur on Borneo Island, April 7, 1996. The demonstrators demanded the government to stop work on the dam project that they say will inundate large areas of rain forest and force more than 10,000 people to move. (AP Photo/Bernama)
Under the ISA, police officers are allowed to arrest anyone believed to have acted or who may act in "any manner prejudicial to the security of Malaysia." Used mainly against human rights defenders and Islamists, it also has been used on members of trade unions, political opposition figures, as well as suspected criminals when there is not enough evidence to charge them for crimes. Detainees are held at Kamunting Protective Detention prison, nicknamed Malaysia's Gitmo. (Ironically, in 2006, the current prime minister of Malaysia called on the USG to close Guantanamo.) Over 80 civil society groups have formed a coalition to repeal the ISA, called the Abolish ISA Movement.

The lack of protection by law takes different forms. In addition to not availing the accused with court protections, the process itself can be made to hinder or silence the work of government critics through long and expensive court proceedings. Human rights defender Irene Fernandez was subjected to a seven-year-long trial for a report she published on the condition of camps for undocumented workers. In addition, her passport was impounded in 2003, preventing her from attending the Carter Center Human Rights Defenders Policy Forum in November that year. According to the prosecutor in the trial against her for allegedly printing false news, she would "tarnish the image of the country" if she were allowed to attend the conference.

State control of most media outlets also prevents a real opportunity for dissident voices to be heard. The Printing Presses and Publication Act regulates television and radio stations. Such intimidation of the media is gaining momentum as the government turns its interest from traditional outlets to the Internet. In June 2007, the government announced it would create a task force to assess ways to circumvent the Multimedia Bill of Guarantee, which limits the government from censoring Internet content. A blogger of the Internet site Malaysia Today and other staff have been questioned by authorities.  As recently as July, the government proposed new regulations of Internet content. On July 25, 2007, government minister Nazri Abdul Aziz reportedly threatened to prosecute bloggers who write on certain issues under Sedition Act of 1948, the ISA, and the penal code's section 121b.

Human Rights Violations Against Migrants
Undocumented migrant workers face harsh treatment by the Malaysian government. Those deemed to be undocumented migrant workers are sent to detention camps that do not conform to international standards of care. Refugees and asylum seekers have been included in this group because arresting officers are not aware of their protected status. This has been exacerbated by the existence of a People's Volunteer Corps that is empowered to arrest migrant workers. Under a 2005 amendment to the Public Protections Authorities Act of 1948, the circumstances in which this laymen corps can be prosecuted for misconduct were curtailed.


Sources used: Library of Congress – Federal Research Division, Malaysia Country Profile, September 2006; Asia Times online; Malaysia Today; Center for Independent Journalism, Malaysia; Human Rights Watch; International Crisis Group; Economist Intelligence Unit.

Web links
Tenaganita - Protecting the Rights of Women and Migrants
Abolish ISA Movement

Malaysia Kini
Center for Independent Journalism, Malaysia
Malaysia Today
Sisters in Islam
All Women's Action Society
Asian Pacific Resource and Research Center for Women
Bar Council of Malaysia
Women's Aids Organization
Women's Center for Change
Women's Development Collective
 

Updated August 2007